Skip to main content

DIMINUTION OF VISION IN THE EYES


A male patient of age 77 years old resident of vangamurthy presented to the opd with chief complaints of 

1) diminution of vision in both eyes since 2 years 

HISTORY OF PRESENTING ILLNESS:-

Patient was apparently asymptomatic 2 months ago and he developed diminution of vision which was insidious in onset and gradually progressive in nature . 

It was not associated with watering , photophobia , redness or itching . 

HISTORY OF PAST ILLNESS:-

There was a history of surgery related to CHD 1 year ago 

There was a history of auditory and visual hallucinations since 1 year and was diagnosed 1 month ago .

K/C/O of DM 2 since months 

Not K/C/O of asthma , epilepsy , Tb 

TREATMENT HISTORY:-

1) Metformin 500 mg 

2) risperidone 2 mg 

PERSONAL HISTORY:-

Sleep : inadequate 

Appetite : loss of appetite 

Bladder and bowel : regular 

Drug allergies : no 

Addictions : no 

FAMILY HISTORY:-

Not significant


PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:- 


1) general examination: 


Height - 

Weight - 

Icterus - no 

Cyanosis - no 

Clubbing - no 

Pedal Edema - no 

Temperature - 98 f 

Pulse rate - 78 bpm

Respiratory rate - 17 cpm 

Spo2 - 98 % 

Grbs-  136 mg % 


2) systemic examination: 


CVS - s1 , s 2 heard 

CNS - 

Respiratory - vesicular breath sound


INVESTIGATIONS:- 

1) RBS 




2) serology 



PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS:-

                   Left eye senile mature cataract 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A 45 YEAR  FEMALE WITH FEVER, VOMITING AND SHORTNESS OF BREATH This is an online E log book to discuss our patient's de-identified health data shared after taking his/her/guardian's signed informed consent.  Here we discuss our individual patient's problems through series of inputs from available global online community of experts with an aim to solve those patient's clinical problems with collective current best evidence based inputs.  This E log book also reflects my patient-centered online learning portfolio and your valuable inputs on the comment box is welcome.” I've been given this case to solve in an attempt to understand the topic of "patient clinical data analysis" to develop my competency in reading and comprehending clinical data including history, clinical findings, investigations and come up with a diagnosis and treatment plan. A 45year female Presented with  C/O Fever since 5 days C/O Vomiting since 4 days C/O Headache since 4 days C/O Shortn
  BIMONTHLY ASSIGNMENT OF MEDICINE FOR AUGUST 2021 BELOW IS THE LINK TO THE QUESTIONS ASKED TO US:- http://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2021/08/medicine-paper-for-aug-2021-bimonthly.html QUESTION 1:- Below is the link of the student for which I am giving my peer review. https://2018-21batchpgy3gmpracticals.blogspot.com/2021/08/18100006003-case-presentations.html?m=1 LONG CASE  :- A 44 year old man presented with a 3-day history of bilaterally symmetrical rapidly progressive generalized edema. REVIEW:- *The Case is well presented and  p atient data has be deidentified and privacy is marked. *C ase history is taken beautifully precisely taken including social ,educational and surgical  history which is way too essential to understand the socio economic back ground of the patient and helpful in accurate diagnosis. FINAL DIAGNOSIS : - *Acute Glomerulonephritis, likely due to Secondary Amyloidosis due to Chronic Poorly Treated Seronegative Erosive Rheumatoid Arthritis. *Dilutional Hypona
  BIMONTHLY ASSIGNMENT OF MEDICINE FOR JULY 2021 BELOW IS THE LINK TO THE QUESTIONS ASKED TO US:- http://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2021/07/medicine-paper-for-july-2021-bimonthly.html?m=1 QUESTION 1:- Below is the link of the student for which I am giving my peer review. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://angasanvith09.blogspot.com/2021/07/general-medicine-assignment.html%26amp;sa%3DD%26amp;source%3Deditors%26amp;ust%3D1626285857750000%26amp;usg%3DAOvVaw1I_MGzhIo0PPVtxipHNTa3&sa=D&source=editors&ust=1626285858217000&usg=AOvVaw1DbqqMfufy_38kPpzIaX2r Reviews to all the questions answered:- 1) The reviews for the cases selected are well described. A detailed pinpoint review has been given to each particular case selected, which is helpful in easy analysis.  Even though the peer reviews giving are short they are well described. 2)He  went with good investigations and given a better explanation for every case. Even every  investigation a